Uncategorized High Court decides tax issue of characterization of software payments in favour of taxpayer: Not all payments relating to software attract Withholding Tax! – JD Supra
The High Court has given its decision in Income Tax Appeal No 8 of 2017: Seven Seas Technologies Limited v. Commissioner of Domestic Taxes, upholding the taxpayer’s position that there is a distinction between payments made to purchase copyrighted material (such as copyrighted software) and payments made to acquire the right to use copyright in a material (such as a payment that results in a taxpayer obtaining rights to the source code in the software). Only the latter payments fall within the ambit of a "royalty" and are subject to Withholding Tax (WHT).
The High Court has determined that, in order for a software-related payment to amount to a royalty that is subject to WHT, the payer must have acquired any or all of the rights that enable them to commercially exploit the software as envisaged under section 26 of the Copyright Act. These rights include the exclusive right to reproduce the software in any material form and the exclusive right to translate or adapt the software.
In arriving at its decision, the High Court relied on the decision of the Supreme Court of India in Engineering Analysis Centre of Excellence Private Ltd v. Commissioner of Income Tax Civil Appeals No. 8733-8734 and established the following principles:
The High Court also considered and adopted international best practice by applying the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development Model Tax Convention on Income and on Capital. This states that software distributors only make payment to acquire copies of copyrighted software and do not exploit any copyright in the software.
The High Court concluded that the taxpayer, who was a software distributor, was only a vendor of copyrighted material (the software) and it did not acquire the right to use the copyright in the said software. As a result, no WHT was payable by the taxpayer on payments it made to purchase the software.
The decision by the High Court has clarified the interplay between the Income Tax Act and the Copyright Act, 2001. Not all software-related payments are subject to WHT.
The decision stresses the need for parties concluding software agreements to ensure that the agreements clearly and expressly articulate the nature of rights conferred with respect to the software. Any limitations and exclusions should be expressly set out. The software agreements will be the first point of call in the event a dispute arises as to whether payments made under the agreement amount to a royalty for WHT purposes.
The Kenya Revenue Authority has the right to appeal the decision to the court of appeal but, unless and until this decision is set aside, it is binding on any ongoing disputes before the Tax Appeals Tribunal. This should come as a relief to taxpayers with ongoing disputes.
See more »
DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.
© Dentons | Attorney Advertising
Refine your interests »
This website uses cookies to improve user experience, track anonymous site usage, store authorization tokens and permit sharing on social media networks. By continuing to browse this website you accept the use of cookies. Click here to read more about how we use cookies.
Back to Top
Explore 2021 Readers’ Choice Awards
Copyright © JD Supra, LLC
